Quote:
Originally Posted by JPH83
This is exactly what I've been saying and I'm only more convinced of it now. The depth is at WR, we need a WR. That seems the most plausible pick to me and it's not really close, imo
|
But it's extremely unlikely, IMO, that there's going to be a line of demarcation near where we pick at WR.
Yes, there's depth at the WR position. But I think there's a solid chance that the person we're looking at at 32 is maybe 5% better than a guy we could get at 64.
Walker vs. McMillan is the sort of example I'd use here.
That's just not going to be the case at OT.
I think there's a really good chance there are D1 contributors in the 2nd or even 3rd round at WR and on the DL. I'm not seeing that at Offensive Tackle.